Patient perspectives on BCMA-targeted therapies for multiple myeloma: a survey conducted in a patient advocacy group.

Background: Advances in multiple myeloma (MM) treatment have shifted the therapeutic landscape. Understanding patients' perspectives can assist physicians in helping patients make informed decisions. This study aimed to understand the patient decision-making process and gain insights into patient perspectives on B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-targeted therapies for MM. Methods: An 18-question survey was completed by patients with MM enrolled in HealthTree® Cure Hub, an online portal helping patients with plasma cell dyscrasias navigate their disease. Results: From October 28, 2022, to January 12, 2023, 325 patients with MM participated in the survey. The mean age (standard deviation) of the respondents was 66 (8) years; 54% were female and 90% were White. Among 218 patients with complete clinical records in the database, the median (min, max) lines of therapy (LOT) was 2 (1,16). Among 61 (28%) patients who had received ≥4 LOTs, 55 (90%) were triple-class exposed. Of the 290 patients who responded to the question about openness to new therapies, 76 (26%) were open to trying a new therapy immediately and 125 (43%) wanted more information on safety and efficacy. Most respondents reported likely or very likely to try a BCMA CAR T-cell therapy (60%) or a bispecific antibody (74%) and some needed more information to decide (16% for CAR T-cell therapy and 13% for bispecific antibody). The most requested information included efficacy, side effects (SEs), eligibility, and administration process for both CAR T-cell and bispecific therapies. When 2 therapies with the same efficacy and duration of response were offered, 69% of respondents would prefer the therapy with a lower risk of severe SEs but requires continuous dosing with no treatment-free interval, and 31% preferred a therapy given once followed by a treatment-free interval but with a potentially higher risk of severe SEs. To receive an effective therapy, the top acceptable trade-offs included frequent monitoring of SEs and initiating a new therapy in a hospital setting, and the least acceptable compromise was caregiver burden. Conclusions: This study found a high level of openness in patients with MM to try BCMA-targeted therapies. Information on efficacy, safety, availability, and eligibility may assist patients on decision-making.

Physical Activity and Patient-Reported Outcomes in Monoclonal Plasma Cell Disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Plasma cell disorders (PCD) are a group of conditions characterized by disproportionate proliferation of a single clone of B lymphocytes. Multiple myeloma (MM) is a malignant type of plasma cell disorders. Improvements in MM survival have led patients and physicians to pursue strategies to improve quality of life for those living longer with this disease. Bone disease and instability associated with MM have made physicians reluctant to recommend physical activity (PA) to this patient population. The goal of this study was to examine the relationship between PA and physical and psychosocial patient-reported outcomes in patients with MM and precursor conditions. METHODS: We used a cross-sectional study design. Questionnaires on PA, demographics, fatigue, distress, and other aspects of quality of life were posted on the HealthTree® Cure Hub website, a patient portal through which individuals with MM and related disorders obtain support, track laboratories and other information about their diseases, and participate in research. RESULTS: A total of 794 individuals, including 664 with MM, are included in the current analysis. We observed potential inverse associations between PA and poor quality of life, including problems with sleep, fatigue, neuropathy, distress, and several psychosocial states. On average, patients reported that their PA levels have declined since diagnosis and that they would like to be even more active in the future than they were before their diagnosis. CONCLUSIONS: In our cross-sectional study, regular PA was associated with multiple quality-of-life indicators and other patient-reported outcomes, including better sleep and less fatigue, neuropathy, and distress. The findings of this study can help guide the design of prospective studies of the role of PA in MM survivorship.

Integrative medicine in multiple myeloma and plasma cell disorders.

INTRODUCTION: Integrative Medicine (IM) use and efficacy is poorly defined in those with plasma cell disorders (PCD). A 69-question survey on the subject was hosted on HealthTree.org for 3 months. METHOD: The survey included questions about complementary practice use, PHQ-2 score, quality of life, and more. Mean outcome values were compared between IM users and non-users. Proportions of supplement users and IM patients were compared between patients currently on myeloma specific treatment and patients not currently on treatment. RESULTS: The top 10 IM modalities reported among 178 participants were aerobic exercise (83 %), nutrition (67 %), natural products (60 %), strength exercise (52 %), support groups (48 %), breathing exercises (44 %), meditation (42 %), yoga (40 %), mindfulness-based stress reduction (38 %), and massage (38 %). The survey showed most patients participated in IM modalities, though they felt uncomfortable discussing them with their oncologist. Participant characteristics were compared between groups (users and non-users) using two-sample t-tests and chi-square tests. Use of vitamin C (3.6 vs. 2.7; p = 0.01), medical marijuana (4.0 vs. 2.9; p = 0.03), support groups (3.4 vs. 2.7; p = 0.04), and massage (3.5 vs. 2.7; p = 0.03) were associated with a higher quality of life scores on MDA-SI MM. There were no other significant associations between supplement use or IM practices and the MDA-SI MM, brief fatigue inventory, or PHQ-2. CONCLUSION: This study provides a foundation in the understanding of IM use in PCD, but more research is needed to evaluate individual IM interventions and their efficacy.

HealthTree Cure Hub: A Patient-Derived, Patient-Driven Clinical Cancer Information Platform Used to Overcome Hurdles and Accelerate Research in Multiple Myeloma.

PURPOSE: The study of rare diseases, such as multiple myeloma (MM), often experiences unique research hurdles that can delay or prevent lifesaving discoveries. HealthTree Cure Hub is a first-in-class software program designed to overcome these potential research hurdles. METHODS: We assessed whether HealthTree Cure Hub improved four commonly experienced research hurdles such as (1) small numbers of patient accrual to clinical trials and research studies, (2) shallow and isolated data sets, (3) high costs to answer research questions, and (4) lack of long-term follow-up patient data. RESULTS: As of June 2021, HealthTree Cure Hub, with its unique portal features, has attracted 9,225 patients with MM and diverse demographic backgrounds. While completing an online health profile, patients shared comprehensive data, as well as provided consent to contribute data from electronic medical records. Portal use answered research questions using patient-driven real-world data. This also cultivated relationships with patients and established communication channels that enabled continual patient contact to allow for long-term follow-up. CONCLUSION: These results suggest that a patient-driven data capture tool such as HealthTree Cure Hub will help alleviate common research hurdles, which, in turn, will accelerate MM research, develop new hypotheses, and ultimately improve survival.